Rethinking Palliative Care: A New Approach to Managing FTD



Partners in FTD Care, Winter 2020
Download the full issue (pdf)

Palliative care is specialized medical care for people facing serious illnesses. It can be used at any point in the disease to promote quality of life for both people living with FTD and their care partners. (Palliative care during the final stages of a progressive disease is known as hospice care.) Because the use of palliative care is relatively new in dementia, there are challenges—particularly in FTD, which is less common and less understood than other dementias. As FTD families and their healthcare providers increasingly engage with palliative care professionals, this valuable service will continue to develop and grow for people facing FTD.

The Case of Mary S.

Background and Diagnosis

At age 48, Mary Smith, a divorced woman with three adult children, started exhibiting cognitive and behavioral change—her actions became more impulsive, her mood was changeable, and she grew increasingly self-absorbed. She initially resisted seeing a doctor, but, on her husband’s insistence, consulted with a family acquaintance who was a psychiatrist. She was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and prescribed lithium. Her symptoms, however, did not improve. Once an active and respected lawyer, Mary began to lose clients they complained that she failed to follow up with them, and at times made rude or inappropriate comments about them. She became prone to angry outbursts that also affected her ability to function at work, and began compulsively eating unhealthy food. At home she seemed only to be interested in food—buying, eating and looking for snacks throughout the day. She stopped communicating with her husband, Tom, and one day casually confessed that she had had several affairs. Tom, increasingly frustrated and angry at his wife’s apparent stubborn indifference, decided to file for divorce. Throughout it all, Mary insisted she was fine.

Now living alone, Mary’s difficulties continued. Her adult sons did not understand the changes in their mother and pursued job opportunities and relationships that drew them several hours away. Tom, a physician who worked at a local hospital, maintained occasional contact, both to make sure her bills were being paid and to relay information to their sons. He witnessed growing changes to his ex-wife’s behavior and appearance, including weight gain that he attributed to the overconsumption of fatty foods and sweets. (She had previously been a very health-conscious eater and frequent exerciser.)

Because Mary did not think anything was wrong—and, apart from the weight gain, seemed fairly healthy—Tom was unable to convince her to follow up with the doctor. But after Mary ran a red light in front of a police officer, causing an accident that injured a pedestrian, then denied her involvement, Tom knew he needed to act. He arranged for a comprehensive evaluation at the cognitive neurology clinic in his hospital. At 54 years old, Mary was diagnosed with FTD. Additionally, the evaluation showed that her blood glucose levels were elevated, and she was diagnosed with adult onset diabetes. Doctors prescribed an oral antidiabetic medication and recommended that she lose weight and adapt a healthy diet.

After her diagnoses, it became clear Mary could no longer safely live independently. She refused the recommended diabetes treatment, and her weight continued to climb. Her hygiene and self care declined, and she was increasingly seen roaming the neighborhood, looking in mailboxes, car windows, and trash cans. As advocates for her care, Tom and their sons sought alternative living arrangements. Although divorced from Mary for six years, Tom remained her power of attorney for both property and health care, allowing him to act on her behalf. With the family’s help, Mary entered a continuing care community’s assisted living facility. While unsure of the move, Mary thought it might be nice not to have to do everything herself—as long as she still had her independence and could keep her favorite belongings.

Transition to Long-Term Care

When first admitted, Mary watched television in her apartment, walked to a convenience store down the block several times a day, and was on time for every meal in the dining room. She received medication assistance and was put on a special diet to manage her diabetes. But fairly soon, her compulsive behaviors around food created challenges for residents, care staff, and the nurse monitoring Mary’s diabetes. Mary ate handfuls of cookies and fruit that were made available throughout the facility, and became agitated and verbally aggressive when staff intervened.

Once, while Mary was on the hunt for a sweet treat, she tripped and fell, dislocating her shoulder. While in the hospital, the effects of her uncontrolled diabetes were evident, and her need for more supervision and hands-on assistance became clear. She would not be able to go out alone, thus eliminating her main activity, and would need one-on-one assistance for showering, meals, and medication. Her interactions with other residents would also need to be monitored.

The assisted living community had a dementia program, but they hesitated to accept Mary because the program had only older residents and the staff lacked experience with FTD. Tom knew finding a program would be difficult and did not feel he had the knowledge to do so alone. He learned from his colleagues that palliative care might help him manage difficult aspects of Mary’s care and transitions as her disease progressed. He asked her attending physician at the hospital about getting a referral. The physician said he was not sure how much palliative care would help, but nevertheless gave Mary a referral for a consultation.

Tom and Mary were connected with Liam, a palliative care nurse practitioner from a community-based hospice and palliative care provider that specialized in caring for persons with dementia. He described the goals of the initial palliative care consultation and subsequent visits: to address pain and symptoms, to provide education about a specific dementia diagnosis, and to address the emotional and spiritual needs of persons diagnosed and their families. He noted that visits generally take place each month and are covered, in part or in full, by Medicare, Medicaid and most private insurance; they can also take place while Mary is receiving treatment for her diabetes.

Tom and the palliative care team determined that Mary’s immediate needs were to stabilize and adjust for her injury, manage her diabetes, ensure proper residential care placement, and relieve her increasing anxiety. Working to repair Mary’s fractured relationship with her family was a secondary, but no less important, goal.

Over several visits, Liam taught Mary and her family about her health conditions and prognosis. Together, they talked about their goals for Mary’s care at this point in her life. What are the most distressing symptoms she experiences? Does she feel safe and comfortable? What would give her pleasure and meaningful engagement? And looking ahead, what type of medical intervention do they want should she develop complications (from a fall or infection, for example)? Liam helped the family develop advanced care planning documents and gathered the information needed to help Mary and her family feel more equipped to make care decisions based on their goals, values and preferences.

Before Mary returned to the continuing care facility, Liam convened her family and the facility’s dementia program staff to discuss ways to provide care at the greater level Mary now required while maintaining her quality of life. Tom and their sons wanted her to be as content as possible. They chose to continue administering her oral diabetic medicine for as long as possible, and to continue with her special diabetic-friendly meals. They also allowed her to eat as many diabetic-friendly snacks as she wanted, from a container accessible only to her. The family stated they preferred that staff not initiate insulin injections if Mary’s diabetes worsened. And they requested staff stop monitoring her glucose levels with finger sticks three times a day.

The facility nursing staff was uncomfortable with the idea of not actively treating Mary’s diabetes. But her family strongly felt that, as her FTD progressed, the additional medical interventions would confuse her (she would not understand the need for such frequent finger sticks) and become challenging to implement (she would not be able to self-inject insulin). They asked Liam to facilitate a discussion between them and the facility’s physician, during which they developed and signed a “negotiated risk” document, which outlined in writing Mary’s amended care plan. This allowed the facility staff to honor the wishes of Mary and her family while absolving them from blame if something went wrong (as long as they followed the care plan). Staff and family all agreed that Mary move to the facility’s dementia care unit to receive the more comprehensive care she needed.

Progression and Decline

As Mary’s FTD progressed, she engaged less with family and friends during visits; facility staff also noticed rapid weight loss (10 pounds in three months) along with decreased verbalization and mobility. She spent much of her day moving around in her chair, standing and sitting incessantly. Interventions that once helped ease her restlessness (using a more comfortable chair and bed, looking at photos of her loved ones) no longer seemed to comfort her.

Liam was brought in to perform a physical evaluation of Mary and to review her medical history and current medications. He also talked to her family, her attending physician and the facility staff to identify their concerns, so that he could help modify her care plan accordingly. After the family said they were alarmed by her changing behavior, her rapid decline and her overall quality of life, Liam arranged a meeting between them, Mary’s attending physician and the facility’s dementia program director. They discussed care preferences and behavior triggers, and agreed to assess Mary’s response to music therapy, aromatherapy and massage; they also talked about making changes to her medication in order to increase comfort and decrease restlessness. Liam also facilitated spiritual support and grief counseling for Mary’s family, who were struggling with her decline.

During palliative care follow-up visits over the next several months, Liam noted that new interventions like music therapy and gentle touch therapy seemed to make Mary more engaged and increased her quality of life. Music therapy was particularly beneficial: As she softly sang along to her favorite songs, her restlessness and constant movement both decreased. However, Mary’s weight, verbalization, mobility and posture all continued to decline, and long-term care facility staff reported that she was starting to have difficulty swallowing.

Mary’s clear and rapid decline indicated that her FTD was progressing into its late stage, and that she could be eligible for hospice care. After discussing care options with Tom, Liam and the palliative care team requested a hospice evaluation. Like palliative care, hospice focuses on comfort care. But in hospice, medically focused treatments and medications that no longer appear to be helpful will be stopped. Hospice is recommended when a person is determined to have six months or less to live.

On hospice care, Mary became totally dependent on others to perform nearly all activities of daily living (she remained able to hold a glass and drink from it). Her problems with swallowing food continued to worsen as her condition progressed. Tom asked staff to reevaluate her medications and discontinue those that were no longer needed based on her changing symptoms. He also asked them to discontinue her oral diabetic medication, even though this carried a risk of complications.

While remaining alert, Mary became minimally verbal. Due to instability she experienced while moving, she spent much of her time in a recliner for comfort and support. The hospice interdisciplinary team visited her several times a week, and called Tom at least once a week to provide support and updates on her conditions, which helped the family improve the quality of their visits.

Mary nevertheless continued to decline, and, shortly after her 58th birthday, she died at the facility, from aspiration pneumonitis. Since Liam had frequently talked to her family about loss, grief and bereavement in the years leading to her death, they were better prepared to cope with her dying process. Throughout, they recognized and appreciated the palliative approach to her care.

After Mary’s death, they told other FTD families about their experiences with palliative care, noting how they benefited from all the support they received in designing positive approaches to distressing behaviors, facilitating productive interdisciplinary care conversations, addressing grief, and maintaining Mary’s comfort. They found the benefits of palliative care to be cumulative, and that it helped to mitigate much of the anguish and suffering associated with dementia care.

Questions for discussion:

1. What were the benefits of palliative care in Mary’s case?
Introducing a palliative care specialist as part of the care team, to support early transitions in care and provide her and her family support, proved to be valuable to her care and quality of life. Some of its benefits included: Designing positive approaches to distressing behaviors, facilitating productive interdisciplinary conversations, addressing grief, advocating for the family’s care preferences, and maintaining Mary’s comfort. Palliative care helped to inform and facilitate their decision making and reduced the associated anxiety and isolation that is often experienced in FTD care.

2. What are three ways the palliative care nurse practitioner supported Mary and her family?
Liam, the palliative care nurse practitioner, followed Mary’s care intimately, from diagnosis to death. He assisted Mary and her family in the areas of support, comfort, education, and symptom management. Three specific examples of how he supported Mary and her family are:

  • Palliative care was consulted when Mary was hospitalized after a fall. Her need for physical assistance and supervision made semi-independent living no longer a safe option. Liam helped the family find alternative living arrangements for Mary. With his help, Mary was accepted and transitioned effectively to the dementia unit of the continuing care facility.
  • As an advocate for Mary and her family’s wishes for her care—some of which differed from recommendations made by the facility physicians and nurses—Liam facilitated care conversations to help create a “negotiated risk” document,allowing staff to safely care for Mary according to her family’s preferences.
  • As Mary’s FTD progressed and her diabetes worsened, her family became increasingly concerned with her comfort and quality of life. Liam helped them coordinate with the residential care team. He facilitated a care planning meeting at which Mary, her family, and the continuing care staff agreed on an individualized plan of care that prioritized music therapy, massage, and medication changes. Seeing the family’s distress over her decline, he offered and arranged for grief counseling and spiritual support, delivered by other members of the palliative care team.

3. Why was Mary referred to hospice?
Mary’s family and long-term care staff observed a continued decline in Mary’s weight, verbalization, mobility, and posture, as well as increased difficulty with swallowing that made taking oral medications an uncomfortable struggle. To the palliative care team, Mary’s deficits in activities of daily living, as well as her clear and rapid decline, reflected signs of late-stage FTD and potential eligibility for hospice care. Like palliative care, hospice focuses on comfort care. However, in hospice, medically focused treatments and medications that no longer appear to be helpful will be stopped.

Resources

The Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) is a nonprofit organization affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City. It provides a variety of resources designed to promote the use of palliative care, so that people facing serious illnesses can get quality, person-centered care. Some of those resources include:

See also: